Comparison of intraoperative hemodynamics in classical and single-port adrenalectomy
https://doi.org/10.14341/serg12837
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pheochromocytoma (PCC) is a tumor from the chromaffin tissue of the adrenal medulla, capable of hyperproduction of catecholamines. An important feature of pheochromocytoma, due to its hormonal activity, is the threat of sudden changes in hemodynamic parameters during surgical treatment. Retroperitoneoscopic access is currently becoming increasingly popular in the surgical treatment of chromaffin tumors of the adrenal glands. In clinical practice, two variants of the mentioned access are used: classic (three-port) and single-port. In this study, the influence of these options of retroperitoneoscopic access on intraoperative hemodynamic control was evaluated.
AIM: Comparison of treatment results and intraoperative hemodynamic parameters of patients with adrenal pheochromocytomas operated with single-port and three-port retroperitonescopic access options.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted on a sample of patients initially operated for pheochromocytoma at the Pirogov St. Petersburg State University High Medical Technology Clinic from October 2015 to February 2020 with intraoperative invasive hemodynamic control using PiCCO+ systems.
RESULTS: 47 patients were examined, 24 of whom underwent single–port adrenalectomy (included in the first group), 23 — three-port (second group). The average tumor size in the second group was larger (40.12±9.3 and 56.7±21.5, p<0.05), presumably, in this regard, the average duration of surgery was statistically significantly higher (73±21.5 and 111.7±36.1, p<0.05). The body mass index (BMI) of patients in the two groups did not differ statistically significantly. Intraoperatively measured values of maximum and minimum mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, the number of episodes of increased diastolic blood pressure above 120 mmHg and their duration did not differ statistically in both groups (p>0.05). Episodes of increased systolic blood pressure above 180 mm Hg were more frequent in the second group (p=0.03), but their total duration in the two groups was without significant differences (p>0.05). Intraoperative consumption of antihypertensive drugs during the release of the adrenal gland and vasopressor drugs after compression of the central vein of the adrenal gland were similar. Blood pressure after compression of the central vein in the first and second groups did not differ significantly (p>0.05). No deaths and postoperative complications were registered in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Single-port modification of retroperitoneoscopic access with sufficient experience of the anesthesiological team and the operating surgeon does not lead to deterioration of hemodynamic control and operation results, being safe and effective in the surgical treatment of pheochromocytoma.
About the Authors
Sh. Sh. ShikhmagomedovRussian Federation
Shamil Sh. Shikhmagomedov – MD; ResearcherID: HSF-0579-2023
6 Uchitelskay street, 195369 Saint-Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
D. V. Rebrova
Russian Federation
Dina V. Rebrova - MD, PhD; Researcher ID: AHD-5099-2022; SCOPUS ID: 57195152806.
190103, Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
M. A. Alekseev
Russian Federation
Mikhail A. Alekseev – MD.
190103, Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
L. M. Krasnov
Russian Federation
Leonid M. Krasnov - MD, PhD, Professor; Researcher ID: AHD-5099-2022; SCOPUS ID: 7003572477.
190103, Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
E. A. Fedorov
Russian Federation
Elisey A. Fedorov - MD, PhD; SCOPUS ID: 57190018578.
190103, Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
I. K. Chinchuk
Russian Federation
Igor K. Chinchuk - MD, PhD; SCOPUS ID: 56001288800.
190103, Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
R. A. Chernikov
Russian Federation
Roman A. Chernikov - MD, PhD; Researcher ID: AAZ-1549-2021; SCOPUS ID: 57190294900.
190103, Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
V. F. Rusakov
Russian Federation
Vladimir F. Rusakov - MD, PhD
190103, Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
I. V. Sleptsov
Russian Federation
Ilia V. Slepstov - MD, PhD; Researcher ID: F-1670-2019; SCOPUS ID: 57216017997.
190103, Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
I. V. Sablin
Russian Federation
Ilia V Sablin – MD.
190103, Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
O. V. Kuleshov
Russian Federation
Oleg V Kuleshov - MD, PhD.
190103, Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
References
1. Список литературы:
2. Lenders JW, Kerstens MN, Amar L, et al. Genetics, diagnosis, management and future directions of research of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma: a position statement and consensus of the Working Group on Endocrine Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension. Journal of hypertension. 2020;38(8):1443. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002438.
3. Barczynski M, Konturek A, Nowak W. Randomized clinical trial of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy versus lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy with a 5-year follow-up. Annals of Surgery. 2014;260(5):740-748. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000982
4. Dickson PV, Alex GC, Grubbs EG, et al. Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and effective alternative to transabdominal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Surgery. 2011;150(3):452-458. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.004
5. Gavriilidis P, Camenzuli C, Paspala A, et al. Posterior retroperitoneoscopic versus laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy: a systematic review by an updated meta-analysis. World Journal of Surgery. 2021;45(1):168-179. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05759-w
6. Walz MK, Alesina PF. Single access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (SARA)—one step beyond in endocrine surgery. Langenbeck's archives of surgery. 2009;394:447-450. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0418-z
7. Walz MK, Groeben H, Alesina PF. Single-access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (SARA) versus conventional retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (CORA): a case–control study. World journal of surgery. 2010;34(6):1386-1390. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0494-4
8. Walz MK, Groeben H, Alesina PF. Single-access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (SARA) versus conventional retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (CORA): a case–control study. World journal of surgery. 2010:34:1386-1390. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0494-4
9. Beiša V., Kildušis E., Strupas K. Single access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: initial experience //Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques. 2012;7(1):45-49. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.25640
10. Shi TP, Zhang X, Ma X, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: a matched-pair comparison with the gold standard //Surgical endoscopy. – 2011. – Т. 25. – С. 2117-2124. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1506-z
11. Agha A, Hornung M, Iesalnieks I, et al. Single-incision retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and single-incision laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Endourol 2010;24:1765–1770. doi:
12. Rane A, Cindolo L, Schips L, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) adrenalectomy: Technique and outcomes. World J Urol 2012;30:597–604. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0678-z
13. Luo Y, Chen X, Chen Z, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy: Our initial technical experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012;22:584–586. doi:
14. Sho S, Yeh MW, Li N, et al. Single-incision retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: a North American experience. Surgical Endoscopy. 2017;31:3014-3019. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5325-8
15. Walz MK, Alesina PF, Wenger FA, et al. Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy—results of 560 procedures in 520 patients. Surgery. 2006;140(6):943-950. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.039.
16. Matsuda T, Murota T, Oguchi N, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: a literature review. Biomedicine and pharmacotherapy. 2002;56:132-138. doi: 10.1016/s0753-3322(02)00231-7
17. Cheah WK, Clark OH, Horn JK, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma //World journal of surgery. 2002;26:1048-1051. doi: 10.1007/s00268-002-6669-x
18. Wu G, Zhang B, Yu C, et al. Effect of early adrenal vein ligation on blood pressure and catecholeamine fluctuation during laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Urology. 2013;82(3):606-611. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.011.
19. Zhang X, Lang B, Ouyang JZ, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy without previous control of adrenal vein is feasible and safe for pheochromocytoma. Urology. 2007;69(5):849-853. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.078
20. Naranjo J, Dodd S, Martin YN. Perioperative management of pheochromocytoma. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2017;31(4):1427-1439. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.02.023
21. Avisse C, Marcus C, Patey M, et al. Surgical anatomy and embryology of the adrenal glands. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2000;80(1):403-415. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70412-6
22. Kasahara T, Nishiyama T, Takahashi K. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: evaluation of experience and strategy at a single institute. BJU international. 2009;103(2):218-222. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07894.x
Supplementary files
|
1. Рисунок 1. Однопортовая ретроперитонеоскопическая методика. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(257KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
2. Рисунок 2. Трехпортовая ретроперитонеоскопическая методика. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(640KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
Review
For citations:
Shikhmagomedov Sh.Sh., Rebrova D.V., Alekseev M.A., Krasnov L.M., Fedorov E.A., Chinchuk I.K., Chernikov R.A., Rusakov V.F., Sleptsov I.V., Sablin I.V., Kuleshov O.V. Comparison of intraoperative hemodynamics in classical and single-port adrenalectomy. Endocrine Surgery. 2024;18(2):23-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/serg12837

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).