Preview

Endocrine Surgery

Advanced search

MRI without contrast enhancement is a highly accurate method of imaging insulinoma

https://doi.org/10.14341/serg12825

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to the literature, there are contradictory results regarding the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without contrast enhancement (CE) in insulinoma, and studies that analyze the factors influencing the obtaining of false negative results have not been described.

AIM: Evaluation of the operational characteristics of MRI imaging of insulinoma without CE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Imaging studies of the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space were performed in patients with suspected nondiabetic hypoglycemia (NDH): MRI without CE (index test) and CT with CE (first row reference test). Ultrasound examination was used as a reference test of the second row, and arteriostimulated venous blood sampling was used in the third row. The diagnosis of NDH and insulinoma was established based on the detection of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia during laboratory examination and confirmation of the presence of a pancreatic tumor.

RESULTS: 125 patients with insulinoma and 55 patients with other causes of NDH were included. The sensitivity of MRI without CE in the diagnosis of insulinoma was 94%, 95% CI [89%; 98%], specificity — 98%, 95% CI [90%; 100%], prognostic value of a positive result — 99%, 95% CI [95%; 100%], prognostic value of a negative result is 87%, 95% CI [76%; 94%]. The Kappa index of agreement with the final diagnosis was 0.886 (95% CI [0.814; 0.958]), which corresponds to excellent agreement, with CT — 0.750 (95% CI [0.651; 0.850]), which corresponds to significant agreement.

In a comparative analysis of the tomographic and pathomorphological characteristics of insulinoma, in cases with divergent results when using MRI without CE and CT with CE, significant differences in structure, shape, contour features, localization and degree of malignancy of the tumor, as well as the structure of its surrounding parenchyma were not revealed.

In the presented sample, the insulinoma has a median size of 14–15 mm with the median optical density in the native phase of CT 42–44 units.H, hyperintensivity on T2-weighted MRI images in 89%, 95% CI [78%; 95%] cases and low Grade 1 malignancy in 70%, 95% CI [56%; 81%] cases.

CONCLUSION: CT with CE and MRI without CE are characterized by significant agreement in the diagnosis of insulinoma. In this regard, as well as due to the lack of radiation exposure and the strict need for contrast agents, MRI without CE can be recommended as a first-line method on a par with abdominal ultrasound and CT with CE to detect insulinoma.

About the Authors

M. Yu. Yukina
Endocrinology Research Centre
Russian Federation

Marina Yu. Yukina - MD, PhD.

117292, Москва, ул. Дмитрия Ульянова, д. 11; Researcher ID: P-5181-2015; Scopus Author ID: 57109367700


Competing Interests:

none



E. A. Troshina
Endocrinology Research Centre
Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. Troshina - MD, PhD, Professor.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



N. F. Nuralieva
Endocrinology Research Centre
Russian Federation

Nurana F. Nuralieva - MD, PhD.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



N. V. Tarbaeva
Endocrinology Research Centre
Russian Federation

Natalya V. Tarbaeva - MD, PhD.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



O. Yu. Rebrova
Endocrinology Research Centre; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Olga Yu. Rebrova - MD, PhD.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



N. G. Mokrysheva
Endocrinology Research Centre
Russian Federation

Natalia G. Mokrysheva - MD, PhD, Professor.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



References

1. Zhao K, Patel N, Kulkarni K, et al. Essentials of insulinoma localization with selective arterial calcium stimulation and hepatic venous sampling. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020;9(10):1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103091

2. Fu J, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of angio-CT versus multidetector CT in the detection and location for insulinomas. Clinical Radiology. 2020;75(10):796.e11-796.e16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2020.05.012

3. An L, Li W, Yao KC, et al. Assessment of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis and preoperative localization of insulinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80(3):675-680. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.09.014

4. McAuley G, Delaney H, Colville J, et al. Multimodality preoperative imaging of pancreatic insulinomas. Clin Radiol. 2005;60(10):1039-1050. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2005.06.005

5. Mehrabi A, Fischer L, Hafezi M, et al. A systematic review of localization, surgical treatment options, and outcome of insulinoma. Pancreas. 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000000110

6. Zhu L, Xue H, Sun H, et al. Insulinoma detection with MDCT: Is there a role for whole-pancreas perfusion? American Journal of Roentgenology. 2017;208(2):306–314. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16351

7. Lin XZ, Wu ZY, Tao R, et al. Dual energy spectral CT imaging of insulinoma Value in preoperative diagnosis compared with conventional multi-detector CT. European Journal of Radiology. 2012;81(10):2487–2494. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.10.028

8. Song P, Yan JY, Wang Y, Li X. Value of multi-detector computed tomography during intra-arterial infusion of contrast medium for locating insulinomas. Journal of International Medical Research. 2020;48(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519889432

9. Yang Y, Shi J, Zhu J. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive imaging modalities for localization of insulinoma: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Radiology. 2021;145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110016

10. Antwi K, Fani M, Heye T, et al. Comparison of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) PET/CT, SPECT/CT and 3T MRI for the localisation of occult insulinomas: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in a prospective crossover imaging study. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2018;45(13):2318–2327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4101-5

11. Hasanov R, Samadov E, Bayramov N, et al. Surgical management of insulinomas at the Azerbaijan medical university: A retrospective study of 21 cases over a 10-year period. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;50(5):1262–1269. doi: https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2001-150

12. Daneshvar K, Grenacher L, Mehrabi A, et al. Preoperative tumor studies using MRI or CT in patients with clinically suspected insulinoma. Pancreatology. 2011;11(5):487–495. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000330208

13. Owen NJ, Sohaib SAA, Peppercorn PD, et al. MRI of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Br J Radiol. 2001;74(886):968-973. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.74.886.740968

14. Thoeni RF, Mueller-Lisse UG, Chan R, Do NK, Shyn PB. Detection of Small, Functional Islet Cell Tumors in the Pancreas: Selection of MR Imaging Sequences for Optimal Sensitivity. Radiology. 2000;214(2):483-490. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe32483

15. He M, Xu J, Sun Z, et al. Prospective Comparison of Reduced Field-of-View (rFOV) and Full FOV (fFOV) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) in the Assessment of Insulinoma: Image Quality and Lesion Detection. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(11):1572-1579. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.019

16. Zhu L, Xue H, Sun Z, et al. Prospective comparison of biphasic contrast‐enhanced CT, volume perfusion CT, and 3 Tesla MRI with diffusion‐weighted imaging for insulinoma detection. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46(6):1648-1655. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25709

17. Jyotsna VP, Pal S, Kandasamy D, et al. Evolving management of insulinoma: Experience at a tertiary care centre. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2016;144:771–777. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1477_14

18. Krieger AG, Smirnov AV, Berelavichus SV, et al. Organic hyperinsulinism: radiological diagnostics and surgical treatment. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2016;(6):14-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2016614-22

19. Andreassen M, Ilett E, Wiese D, et al. Surgical Management, Preoperative Tumor Localization, and Histopathology of 80 Patients Operated on for Insulinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(12):6129-6138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2019-01204

20. Angeli E, Vanzulli A, Castrucci M, et al. Value of abdominal sonography and MR imaging at 0.5 T in preoperative detection of pancreatic insulinoma: a comparison with dynamic CT and angiography. Abdom Imaging. 1997;22(3):295-303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900193

21. Shi Z, Li X, You R, et al. Homogenously isoattenuating insulinoma on biphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography: Little benefits of diffusion-weighted imaging for lesion detection. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(3):3117-3125. doi: https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9037

22. Anaye A, Mathieu A, Closset J, et al. Successful preoperative localization of a small pancreatic insulinoma by diffusion-weighted MRI. JOP. 2009;10(5):528-31

23. Cryer PE, Axelrod L, Grossman AB, et al. Evaluation and management of adult hypoglycemic disorders: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(3):709-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-1410

24. Nejroendokrinnye opuholi. Klinicheskie rekomendacii. 2020 (In Russ.)] Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/610_1

25. Ponzi E, Maiorana A, Lepri FR, et al. Persistent Hypoglycemia in Children: Targeted Gene Panel Improves the Diagnosis of Hypoglycemia Due to Inborn Errors of Metabolism. J Pediatr. 2018;202:272-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.06.050

26. Cavalcanti MS, Gönen M, Klimstra DS. The ENETS/WHO grading system for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a review of the current state, limitations and proposals for modifications. Int J Endocr Oncol. 2016;3(3):203-219. doi: https://doi.org/10.2217/ije-2016-0006

27. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.

28. Egorov AV, Musaev GKh, Fominykh EV, Kondrashin SA, Parnova VA, et al. Evolution of topical diagnostic algorithm for pancreatic hormoneproducing neuroendocrine tumors. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2016;21(1):21-27. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2016121-27

29. Fu J, Liu F, Yuan K, et al. The Value of Hybrid Angio-CT in Preoperative Detection and Localization of Insulinomas: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(4):633-638. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1847-2

30. Druce MR, Muthuppalaniappan VM, O’Leary B, et al. Diagnosis and localisation of insulinoma: the value of modern magnetic resonance imaging in conjunction with calcium stimulation catheterization. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;162(5):971-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-10-0056

31. Crippa S, Zerbi A, Boninsegna L, et al. Surgical management of insulinomas: shortand long-term outcomes after enucleations and pancreatic resections. Arch Surg. 2012;147(3):261-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.1843

32. Khacimova LS, Karonova TL, Tsoy UA, Ianevskaia LG, Grineva EN. Insulinoma: diagnostic features and treatment management. Problems of Endocrinology. 2017;63(4):212-218. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/probl2017634212-218

33. Nikfarjam M, Warshaw AL, Axelrod L, et al. Improved contemporary surgical management of insulinomas: a 25-year experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Ann Surg. 2008;247(1):165-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815792ed

34. Inan N, Arslan A, Akansel G, et al. Unusual magnetic resonance image of an insulinoma with extensive desmoplastic reaction. JOP. 2008;9(1):61-6

35. Afonso PD, Duarte S, Barata MJ, Camacho R. A type of pancreatic islet cell tumor: Insulinoma. A case report. 2007. doi: https://doi.org/10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.6144

36. Sundin A, Arnold R, Baudin E, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Radiological, Nuclear Medicine and Hybrid Imaging. In: Neuroendocrinology. 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000471879

37. Khanna L, Prasad SR, Sunnapwar A, et al. Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: 2020 Update on Pathologic and Imaging Findings and Classification. Radiographics. 2020;40(5):1240-1262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020200025

38. AlJadir S. Insulinoma: Literature’s Review (2). Endocrinol Int J. 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.15406/emij.2015.02.00031

39. Sumarac-Dumanovic M, Micic D, Krstic M, et al. Pitfalls in diagnosing a small cystic insulinoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2007:1:181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-1-181

40. Tamagno G, Maffei P, Pasquali C, et al. Clinical and diagnostic aspects of cystic insulinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40(12):1497-501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00365520510024160

41. Kou HW, Yu MC, Chong SW, Hsu HY, Chou HH, et al. Successful Localization and Resection of Small Pancreatic Cystic Insulinoma Using Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging: A Case Report and Literature Review. Pancreas. 2020;49(10):1388-1392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000001678

42. Balci NC, Semelka RC. Radiologic features of cystic, endocrine and other pancreatic neoplasms. Eur J Radiol. 2001;38(2):113-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0720-048x(01)00296-0

43. Okabayashi T, Shima Y, Sumiyoshi T, et al. Diagnosis and management of insulinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(6):829-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i6.829

44. Kann P, Bittinger F, Engelbach M, et al. Endosonography of insulinsecreting and clinically non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: criteria for benignancy and malignancy. Eur J Med Res. 2001;6(9):385-90

45. Noone TC, Hosey J, Firat Z, Semelka RC, et al. Imaging and localization of islet-cell tumours of the pancreas on CT and MRI. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;19(2):195-211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2004.11.013

46. Taieb D, Legmann P, Prat F, et al. Topographic diagnosis: respective roles of morphological and functional imaging. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2013;74(3):185-190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ando.2013.05.008

47. Ciaravino V, De Robertis R, Tinazzi Martini P, et al. Imaging presentation of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Insights Imaging. 2018;9(6):943-953. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0658-6

48. Matondanga S, Suwitaa BM, Budiantoa T, Krisnuhonib E. Atypical CT and MR imaging of insulinoma: A case report. Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology: Case Reports. 2021;19:100075. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecr.2020.100075

49. Agrawal N, Kar SS, Singh A, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in Localization of Insulinoma. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2020;24(2):222-224. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_636_19

50. Soyoye DO, Atolani SA, Adetunji TA, Alatise OI. Insulinoma Presenting as Seizures: Challenges of Managing a Rare Disease in a Resource-challenged Setting. JCEM Case Rep. 2023;2(1):luad162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/jcemcr/luad162


Review

For citations:


Yukina M.Yu., Troshina E.A., Nuralieva N.F., Tarbaeva N.V., Rebrova O.Yu., Mokrysheva N.G. MRI without contrast enhancement is a highly accurate method of imaging insulinoma. Endocrine Surgery. 2024;18(3):24-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/serg12825

Views: 1530


ISSN 2306-3513 (Print)
ISSN 2310-3965 (Online)