Preview

Endocrine Surgery

Advanced search

Loss of signal during intraoperative neuromonitoring of laryngeal nerves as a predictor of postoperative larynx paresis: Analysis of 1065 consequetive thyroid and parathyroid operations. Surgeons' algorythm (tactics)

https://doi.org/10.14341/serg2016315-24

Abstract

During thyroid and parathyroid operations performed with laryngeal nerves neuromonitoring, a segmental or global loss of signal may occur. The most frequent cause of loss of signal – is tension of thyroid gland tissue and at the same time tension of the laryngeal nerves. There is no consensus if this complication arises regarding surgeon’s actions.

Aim. Evaluation of predictive value of loss of signal during IONM regarding larynx paresis in postoperative period, and algorithm suggestion in case of loss of signal develops.

Materials and methods. 1065 patients were operated on thyroid and parathyroid glands with neuromonitoring of laryngeal nerves. Neuromonitore C2 (Inomed, Emmendingen, Germany) was used. We evaluated frequency of loss of signal, described types of loss of signal, showed sensitivity and specificity of loss of signal and development of postoperative larynx paresis.

Results. Loss of signal developed in 32 (1,9%) patients. More frequently loss of signal was detected at left side (p=0,01, χ2 = 4,2 OR=2,9). Sensitivity (Se)  of loss of signal and postoperative larynx paresis development reached 59,2%, specificity – 99,7% (Sp), positive predicitive value (PPV) – 91,4%, negative predictive value (NPV) – 97,8%. There are no statistically reliable differences in recovery periods of larynx function depending on type of loss of signal (segmental or global) (p=0,5).

Conclusions. In most cases loss of electromyographical signal indicates injury of laryngeal nerves during operation on thyroid and parathyroid glands. When there is loss of signal in case of bilateral thyroid gland disease it is reasonable to make a decision to stop operation to prevent development of bilateral larynx paresis.

About the Authors

Viktor A. Makarin
University Hospital of Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
MD, PhD


Anna A. Uspenskaya
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University
Russian Federation
MD


Arseniy A. Semenov
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University; Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
MD, PhD


Natalia I. Timofeeva
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University
Russian Federation
MD, PhD


Roman A. Chernikov
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University
Russian Federation
PhD


Il`ya V. Slepcov
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University; Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
PhD


Igor` K. Chinchuk
University Hospital of Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
MD, PhD


Yulia V. Karelina
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University
Russian Federation
MD


Konstantin Y. Novokshonov
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University
Russian Federation
MD


Elisey A. Fedorov
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University
Russian Federation
MD, PhD


Yuriy N. Malyugov
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University
Russian Federation
MD


Vladimir F. Rusakov
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University
Russian Federation
MD, PhD


Il`ya V. Sablin
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University
Russian Federation
MD


Natalia A. Gorskaya
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University
Russian Federation
MD


Vlada N. Denisenkova
University Hospital of Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation


Yulia V. Ostanina
University Hospital of Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation


Leonid M. Krasnov
University hospital of Saint-Petersburg state University; Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
PhD, Professor


Yuriy N. Fedotov
University Hospital of Saint-Petersburg State University; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation
PhD


Alexandr N. Bubnov
University Hospital of Saint-Petersburg State University; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov; Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
PhD, Professor


References

1. Randolph GW, Dralle H, International Intraoperative Monitoring Study G, et al. Electrophysiologic recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: international standards guideline statement. Laryngoscope. 2011;121 Suppl 1:S1-16. doi: 10.1002/lary.21119.

2. Chiang FY, Lu IC, Kuo WR, et al. The mechanism of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroid surgery--the application of intraoperative neuromonitoring. Surgery. 2008;143(6):743-749. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.02.006.

3. Dralle H, Sekulla C, Lorenz K, et al. Loss of the nerve monitoring signal during bilateral thyroid surgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99(8):1089-1095. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8831.

4. Dionigi G, Wu CW, Kim HY, et al. Severity of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries in Thyroid Surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40(6):1373-1381. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3415-3.

5. Sitges-Serra A, Fontane J, Duenas JP, et al. Prospective study on loss of signal on the first side during neuromonitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in total thyroidectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(5):662-666. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9044.

6. Tsai CJ, Tseng KY, Wang FY, et al. Electromyographic endotracheal tube placement during thyroid surgery in neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2011;27(3):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2010.08.002.

7. Starczewska A, Brol M, Żołnowska A. Advantages of rocuronium bromide in thyroid surgery with neuromonitoring. Proceedings of The 1st World Congress on Neural Monitoring in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery. Cracow; 2015. P. 26.

8. Han YD, Liang F, Chen P. Dosage effect of rocuronium on intraoperative neuromonitoring in patients undergoing thyroid surgery. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015;71(1):143-146. doi: 10.1007/s12013-014-0176-1.

9. Blitzer A, Crumley RL, Dailey SH, et al. Recommendations of the Neurolaryngology Study Group on laryngeal electromyography. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140(6):782-793. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.01.026.

10. Schneider R, Randolph G, Dionigi G, et al. Prospective study of vocal fold function after loss of the neuromonitoring signal in thyroid surgery: The International Neural Monitoring Study Group's POLT study. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(5):1260-1266. doi: 10.1002/lary.25807.

11. Snyder SK, Lairmore TC, Hendricks JC, Roberts JW. Elucidating mechanisms of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(1):123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.017.

12. Dionigi G, Barczynski M, Chiang FY, et al. Why monitor the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery? J Endocrinol Invest. 2010;33(11):819-822. doi: 10.1007/BF03350349.

13. Anuwong A, Lavazza M, Kim HY, et al. Recurrent laryngeal nerve management in thyroid surgery: consequences of routine visualization, application of intermittent, standardized and continuous nerve monitoring. Updates Surg. 2016;68(4):331-341. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0393-9.

14. Reeve T, Thompson NW. Complications of thyroid surgery: how to avoid them, how to manage them, and observations on their possible effect on the whole patient. World J Surg. 2000;24(8):971-975.

15. Lore JM, Jr., Banyas JB, Niemiec ER. Complications of total thyroidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(11):1238.

16. Schneider R, Randolph GW, Sekulla C, et al. Continuous intraoperative vagus nerve stimulation for identification of imminent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Head Neck. 2013;35(11):1591-1598. doi: 10.1002/hed.23187.

17. Schneider R, Sekulla C, Machens A, et al. Postoperative vocal fold palsy in patients undergoing thyroid surgery with continuous or intermittent nerve monitoring. Br J Surg. 2015;102(11):1380-1387. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9889.


Review

For citations:


Makarin V.A., Uspenskaya A.A., Semenov A.A., Timofeeva N.I., Chernikov R.A., Slepcov I.V., Chinchuk I.K., Karelina Yu.V., Novokshonov K.Y., Fedorov E.A., Malyugov Yu.N., Rusakov V.F., Sablin I.V., Gorskaya N.A., Denisenkova V.N., Ostanina Yu.V., Krasnov L.M., Fedotov Yu.N., Bubnov A.N. Loss of signal during intraoperative neuromonitoring of laryngeal nerves as a predictor of postoperative larynx paresis: Analysis of 1065 consequetive thyroid and parathyroid operations. Surgeons' algorythm (tactics). Endocrine Surgery. 2016;10(3):15-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/serg2016315-24

Views: 1396


ISSN 2306-3513 (Print)
ISSN 2310-3965 (Online)